Three Email Courtesies
The following are courtesies: they help the people who read your emails save time. That makes them more productive and, hopefully, a little bit grateful to you :-)
How and when to mark emails "important:"Use the low and high importance flags to mean urgent and not urgent. Specifically, high priority should mean "read this the moment you see it in your in box." Low priority means "you don't need to read this if you don't want to." Anything else means "use your own judgment, but please read this in the fullness of time."
What I do with the high priority flag is this: I use it whenever I would feel justified in interrupting someone else's meeting to tell them something. If it isn't that urgent, I do not mark it high importance.
Edit the subject line freely:Edit the subject line for replies and forwards. Your reader is scanning their in box. What does "
RE: RE: RE: FW: RE: the meeting" mean? Help them scan your subject at a glance. I suggest you almost never use the default "RE:" Instead, do this:
Make up a new subject line that describes your answer to an email and then prepend it to the old line. For example, instead of : "
RE: the meeting", use "
Some suggested topics | RE: the meeting."
This saves your reader a lot of time. Isn't that a tremendous gift?
Put short replies in the subject:Does your reader need to open your email just to read the word "
thanks"? I know Outlook has a preview pane. But it's still extra work to click on each message to see its preview. And if your reader has to set things up to preview every message in their inbox, they can see fewer messages.
Try this instead: put short replies right in the subject line with an indicator that there is no body. I use
<eom/> because it's XML-ish and I happen to hate XML, so it feels like an inside joke. But everyone understands it. So try: "
I'll bring the bagels! <eom/> | RE: the meeting."
That saves your reader even more time. The gift that keeps on giving!
I did not invent these ideas. I don't remember where I heard of them, but I wouldn't be surprised if at some time in the recent past I read a post just like this with these ideas in it. If someone can point out a source for these ideas, please comment and I'll give the proper attribution.