raganwald
(This is a snapshot of my old weblog. New posts and selected republished essays can be found at raganwald.com.)

Friday, August 31, 2007
  Hubris


Sun’s CEO Jonathan Schwartz opines on Java:
It's one of the few technologies that may outlast the century.
 

Comments on “Hubris:
I don't get that; it already did outlast the century. Can we move on now?
 
Patrick:

Jonathan made that statement yesterday, in 2007. Which means, depending on how you figure it, that will last to 2096 or 2101.

Ok, we can move on now.
 
I saw that comment and had the same reaction. What unadulterated hubris.

However, after a bit of thought, I think he might be right. Cobol is still in active use, and it's nearing the half-century mark. With the great swathes of code written in Java right now, some of those same projects could conceivably still be chugging along, maintained by despondent zombies a hundred years from now.

(Did you know Cobol can generate EJBs? Who knew...)
 
@peter

You're assuming that something like Groovy or Scala don't come along and swallow up all the old Java code.
 
It's a reasonable assumption. Mostly because sun brands everything they own with the 'java' brand. Not just the language, but the JVM, the security model, their desktop environment, and now their stock ticker.

For example, even if Robert's prediction that Scala is finally seen for the beauty that it is comes true, we still have a JVM running the Scala code.

Of course, the singularity will come in 20 years or so and make this entire idea moot, but, hey.
 
As an engineer friend of mine once put it, "You can interpolate until the cows come home. But don't you dare extrapolate." A company that turned 25 this year claiming a language that just turned 13 will live for another 93 years, in an industry that hasn't quite reached 60, isn't even hubris. It's just plain stupid.

Yes, there might be some crazy enthusiast running Java on her Virtual Binary FSM as a historical lark in the year 2100, but if she does it for her Senior Project, it will be for her BFA in History.

Imagining that we might still be designing software primarily in four dimensions by the time I retire crushes me with black despair. I cannot bear to imagine what life would be like if we let 100 years go by, programming in straight lines the whole way instead of clouds of curves full of nets.

Good heavens! We still mark time by sloshing wads of electrons back and forth in a piece of rock. You think our great-great-grandchildren will still have a use for a language that runs on hardware that uses this crap?
 




<< Home
Reg Braithwaite


Recent Writing
Homoiconic Technical Writing / raganwald.posterous.com

Books
What I‘ve Learned From Failure / Kestrels, Quirky Birds, and Hopeless Egocentricity

Share
rewrite_rails / andand / unfold.rb / string_to_proc.rb / dsl_and_let.rb / comprehension.rb / lazy_lists.rb

Beauty
IS-STRICTLY-EQUIVALENT-TO-A / Spaghetti-Western Coding / Golf is a good program spoiled / Programming conventions as signals / Not all functions should be object methods

The Not So Big Software Design / Writing programs for people to read / Why Why Functional Programming Matters Matters / But Y would I want to do a thing like this?

Work
The single most important thing you must do to improve your programming career / The Naïve Approach to Hiring People / No Disrespect / Take control of your interview / Three tips for getting a job through a recruiter / My favourite interview question

Management
Exception Handling in Software Development / What if powerful languages and idioms only work for small teams? / Bricks / Which theory fits the evidence? / Still failing, still learning / What I’ve learned from failure

Notation
The unary ampersand in Ruby / (1..100).inject(&:+) / The challenge of teaching yourself a programming language / The significance of the meta-circular interpreter / Block-Structured Javascript / Haskell, Ruby and Infinity / Closures and Higher-Order Functions

Opinion
Why Apple is more expensive than Amazon / Why we are the biggest obstacles to our own growth / Is software the documentation of business process mistakes? / We have lost control of the apparatus / What I’ve Learned From Sales I, II, III

Whimsey
The Narcissism of Small Code Differences / Billy Martin’s Technique for Managing his Manager / Three stories about The Tao / Programming Language Stories / Why You Need a Degree to Work For BigCo

History
06/04 / 07/04 / 08/04 / 09/04 / 10/04 / 11/04 / 12/04 / 01/05 / 02/05 / 03/05 / 04/05 / 06/05 / 07/05 / 08/05 / 09/05 / 10/05 / 11/05 / 01/06 / 02/06 / 03/06 / 04/06 / 05/06 / 06/06 / 07/06 / 08/06 / 09/06 / 10/06 / 11/06 / 12/06 / 01/07 / 02/07 / 03/07 / 04/07 / 05/07 / 06/07 / 07/07 / 08/07 / 09/07 / 10/07 / 11/07 / 12/07 / 01/08 / 02/08 / 03/08 / 04/08 / 05/08 / 06/08 / 07/08 /